Surrealism isn’t a genre — it’s a doorway. Their canvas is a threshold between the conscious and the unconscious, where the familiar becomes strange, and the strange becomes intimately familiar.
Do you feel the dreamworld of Dali’s "The Persistence of Memory" (1931) makes you feel intrigued, or uncomfortable, or both?
Here the content: a man dressed so properly, an ordinary apple, a wall. They are all rendered realistically, in a style that in itself is flat and uninteresting, not at all painterly. Here it’s just the combination and positioning that disturbs.
Which do you find more effective, Magritte or Dali?
Meret Oppenheimer started to record her dreams at the age of 15 (it was not at all usual to do that back in 1928). Look at this object, "Luncheon in Fur" (1936).
Do you think of it more as a light-hearted joke or a profound transformation?
In Max Ernst’s "The Elephant Celebes" (1921), we see a world that looks alive but cannot be - a metal elephant-monster, a headless mannequin beckoning, fish swimming in the sky.
Do you see it as meaningful or meaningless? Threatening or engaging?
In Joan Miró’s "Harlequin’s Carnival" (1924-25) shapes float, wiggle and dance on the canvas like fragments of another world. It’s more abstract, more decorative even.
Do you find it pleasantly playful or closer to nightmarish?
Do you think she is expressing something about her state of mind, or simply presenting us with a puzzle?
If there were an exhibition of Surrealist art within easy reach and with free entry, would you visit or not?
Of the six pictures shown here, which do you rate highest?
Do you have any final thoughts or comments you would like to add?
If you have none, submit your answers to move on.